Difference between revisions of "Preparing spatial analyses"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: Look in PWs notes, should there be any explaining graphics?) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | The most common spatial analyse in forest management planning concern the aggregation of final felled areas. An aggregation could be positive (e.g. when many stands share the fixed costs involved in harvesting) but usually regarded as a problem - large open areas are negative in nature preservation perspectives, in biological diversity matters (bad for many species), etc. "Opening size constrains" are hence often used in a optimization model. Prerequisites for such analyses can be calculated here. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
Look in PWs notes, should there be any explaining graphics? | Look in PWs notes, should there be any explaining graphics? | ||
Revision as of 16:50, 11 September 2009
The most common spatial analyse in forest management planning concern the aggregation of final felled areas. An aggregation could be positive (e.g. when many stands share the fixed costs involved in harvesting) but usually regarded as a problem - large open areas are negative in nature preservation perspectives, in biological diversity matters (bad for many species), etc. "Opening size constrains" are hence often used in a optimization model. Prerequisites for such analyses can be calculated here.
Look in PWs notes, should there be any explaining graphics?