Difference between revisions of "Preparing spatial analyses"

From Heureka Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 6: Line 6:
 
|}
 
|}
 
*'''Adjacencies'''
 
*'''Adjacencies'''
+
In "Tools" > "Adjacencies..." the analysis area of interest is first selected
  
 
Look in PWs notes, should there be any explaining graphics?
 
Look in PWs notes, should there be any explaining graphics?

Revision as of 11:59, 14 September 2009

The most common spatial analyse in forest management planning concern the aggregation of final felled areas. An aggregation could be positive (e.g. when aggregated stands share the fixed costs involved in harvesting) but usually regarded as a problem - large open areas are negative in nature preservation perspectives, in biological diversity matters (being bad for many species), etc. "Opening size constrains" are hence often used in a optimization model. Prerequisites for such analyses can be calculated here.

NB: "Harvest" is here corresponding to final felling, sometimes also called clearcut. Harvesting is done in thinning but a stand will, after such treatment, not show an open area. The real problem occur when seed trees are retained in final fellings. However, the stem density is usually quite low (less than 150 stems per hectare), where quite a few usually will be windthrown in the first couple of years, and hence regarded as an opening.

Map of "Landscape8"
  • Adjacencies

In "Tools" > "Adjacencies..." the analysis area of interest is first selected

Look in PWs notes, should there be any explaining graphics?