Difference between revisions of "Sample design"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*'''When a satisfying stratification of the domain(s) has been obtained, the total number of sample stands are decided''' | *'''When a satisfying stratification of the domain(s) has been obtained, the total number of sample stands are decided''' | ||
| − | + | This is called the sample size-definition part. First, a defined number of sample stands will be allocated to each stratum (e.g., proportional to the volume). You could and probably should re-distribute the sample stands over the different strata, with a higher sampling intensity in strata with more valuable forests and where forest management decisions are supposed to be more difficult. The term and parameter "Representative Area", with a value calculated as ''Productive forest land area in current stratum/Sample size (number of sampled stands) in current stratum'', might be found a bit confusing. ''A scale factor with a unit (hectares)? With the same value for all sampled stands in a stratum (despite they probably will have different areas)?'' Don't worry, as long as the sampling of stands is done PPS, and size is represented by the productive area (in hectares), it will all turn out alright. Try follow this: an estimation of, e.g., the total biomass (in m<sup>3</sup>) in a stratum is derived using a Horvitz-Thompson (HT) estimator with inclusion probabilities (''''<sub>''i''</sub>) defined as ''Area/Area''... | |
''NB: There should be at least three sample stands in each stratum. Moreover, aviod extreme differences in the representative area of different strata.'' | ''NB: There should be at least three sample stands in each stratum. Moreover, aviod extreme differences in the representative area of different strata.'' | ||