Difference between revisions of "Test"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | Version 1.9. | + | Version 1.9.6 |
{{Languages}} | {{Languages}} | ||
− | |||
[[Category:Release]] | [[Category:Release]] | ||
− | [[Release date:: | + | [[Release date::2013-03-05]] |
− | |||
− | |||
==Summary== | ==Summary== | ||
− | + | This release note includes describes changes since version 1.9.5.0. The changes have partly been release already in patches 1.9.5.1 to 1.9.5.4, but for which no newsletter has been published. | |
− | + | Version 1.9.5 | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
==New features == | ==New features == | ||
− | + | *The sharing of project | |
− | *The | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
==Improvements == | ==Improvements == | ||
− | * | + | *is now also accepted when importing stand register data. |
− | + | * When applying forest fuel thinning, utilization grades for different tree fractions have been determined by parameter settings Utilization in control table TreatmentModel. This is intended for harvest residue extraction, and not forest fuel thinning. Therefore parameters Forest Fuel Thinning Utilization have been added to control utilization grades. | |
− | *When | + | *The user-defined utilization grade for needles and branches in the top of a tree have until now been multiplied with the utilization grade of the top. This has been changed so that the utilization grades for needles and branches refer to the proportion of needles and branches available in the part of the trees referred to. This means that the utilization grades are consistent for all tree fractions. So, if the utilization grade for the top is 90 %, and 90 % of the needles in the top are utilized, you set Utilization.Top = 90 % and Utilization.Needles Top = 90 %. To do this in previous versions, you should have set Utilization.Needles Top = 100 % |
− | + | *Data in categories SiteData and StandObjectData are now available in TPG-result view. | |
− | + | .) are now displayed when there is a problem with an optimization model or solver. | |
− | + | *Stand register data files (csv-format) can have different column delimiters depending on language settings. The importer now attempts to detect what delimiter is used. If not successful, the user is asked for the delimiter symbol. | |
− | *The | ||
− | |||
==Bug fixes == | ==Bug fixes == | ||
− | * | + | * When importing a pricelist with the same identifier as a pricelist already present in the project, it was not saved. This has been fixed. |
− | + | *In timber pricelists, there is a column called Waste (vrak). The copy and paste function did not include this column. This has been fixed. | |
− | * | + | *Resetting percent values in control table TreatmentModel now works as expected. |
− | + | *The default value for plant density in RegenerationSettings dialog in control table ProductionModel is now properly saved. | |
− | + | *For biofuel extraction, a model is used to calculate how much of the needle biomass that is located in the (cut) tree top. For this calculation, the length of the tree top is used, which is obtained by multiplying with tree top proportion. Instead of using proportion of length, proportion of volume was used instead, which may have overestimated the amount of needles extracted. This has been fixed. | |
− | + | *Reports using conditions with StandObjectData-variables now work as expected. | |
− | * | + | *The amount of biomass extracted (result category Financial Value) depends on the user-defined utilization grades for different tree fractions (see above), as set in control table TreatmentModel. This control table was mistakenly read from Default Control Category instead of the applied control category. This has been fixed. |
− | + | *The result variable DominantSpecies is used to determine min final felling age. In second generation it was set to the site index species instead of the regenerated species. For example, a regenerated oak stand would obtain pine as dominating species, despite the planted species per se was correct. This has led to too long final felling ages in plantation with deciduous trees or contorta as main species. This problem was unfortunately introduced in version 1.9.4 but has now been solved | |
− | * | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | * | ||
− | |||
− | * | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | * | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− |