Difference between revisions of "Version benchmarking"
LinusNilsson (talk | contribs) |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Category:Release]] | [[Category:Release]] | ||
| − | Here we present a comparison between different versions for a benchmark problem run in PlanWise. We call this problem Hexagons1000, it can be downloaded from [https://www.heurekaslu.se/filerepository/PlanwiseBenchmark/ here]. The problem consists of one thousand simulated treatment units. The results refer to an optimization with simple even-flow constraints. The TPG-simulation includes nine forest domains and the somewhat time-consuming breeding model is activated. For each treatment unit managed with even-aged management a nature conservation retention patch is created | + | Here we present a comparison between different versions for a benchmark problem run in PlanWise. We call this problem Hexagons1000, it can be downloaded from [https://www.heurekaslu.se/filerepository/PlanwiseBenchmark/ here]. The problem consists of one thousand simulated treatment units. The results refer to an optimization with simple even-flow constraints. The TPG-simulation includes nine forest domains and the somewhat time-consuming breeding model is activated. For each treatment unit managed with even-aged management a nature conservation retention patch is created. The forest is a synthetic but is a realistic landscape with respect to age classes, site fertilities and tree species distribution. |
| − | The comparison is intended to present to users a simple form of quality and status check and give some | + | The comparison is intended to present to users a simple form of quality and status check and give some insight into what simulation times that can be expected. Please note that if more result variables are added (such as dead wood, carbon and nitrogen etc.) simulation times might be quite significantly longer. |
| + | Net present value is an good indicator for whether there has been any large model changes, since it basically depends on everything calculated by the growth-and-yield simulator. | ||
This page was/is first published with version 2.11. We intend to run the benchmark problem for each major version released. | This page was/is first published with version 2.11. We intend to run the benchmark problem for each major version released. | ||
| Line 23: | Line 24: | ||
| style="background:#f0f0f0;width:10%;;"|'''Release notes''' | | style="background:#f0f0f0;width:10%;;"|'''Release notes''' | ||
|-style = "vertical-align: top; text-align: center;" | |-style = "vertical-align: top; text-align: center;" | ||
| − | |[[Version 2.19 | + | |[[Version 2.19|2.19]]||||710<sup>d</sup> ||21 224 113 ||39 670 ||2 661 || 4 990 ||7.08||1 000 || 282||16.7||7.0||||[[Version 2.19]] |
|-style = "vertical-align: top; text-align: center;" | |-style = "vertical-align: top; text-align: center;" | ||
|[[Version 2.18.3|2.18.3]]|| ||2153<sup>d</sup> ||21 192 183 ||39 608 ||2 669 || 4 959 ||7.11||1 002 || 293||16.9||7.0||||[[Version 2.18.3]] | |[[Version 2.18.3|2.18.3]]|| ||2153<sup>d</sup> ||21 192 183 ||39 608 ||2 669 || 4 959 ||7.11||1 002 || 293||16.9||7.0||||[[Version 2.18.3]] | ||
Latest revision as of 15:10, 15 September 2022
Here we present a comparison between different versions for a benchmark problem run in PlanWise. We call this problem Hexagons1000, it can be downloaded from here. The problem consists of one thousand simulated treatment units. The results refer to an optimization with simple even-flow constraints. The TPG-simulation includes nine forest domains and the somewhat time-consuming breeding model is activated. For each treatment unit managed with even-aged management a nature conservation retention patch is created. The forest is a synthetic but is a realistic landscape with respect to age classes, site fertilities and tree species distribution.
The comparison is intended to present to users a simple form of quality and status check and give some insight into what simulation times that can be expected. Please note that if more result variables are added (such as dead wood, carbon and nitrogen etc.) simulation times might be quite significantly longer. Net present value is an good indicator for whether there has been any large model changes, since it basically depends on everything calculated by the growth-and-yield simulator.
This page was/is first published with version 2.11. We intend to run the benchmark problem for each major version released.
| Version | TPG-time, 1 CPU-thread(s) | TPG-time, 16 CPU-threads(s) | Total NPV | NPV/ha within managed area | Final felling volume per year, all periods (m3sk/ha,yr) | Final felling volume period 1 (m3sk/ha,yr) | Final felling area per year, all periods (m3sk/ha,yr) | Thinning volume per year, all periods (m3sk/ha,yr) | Thinning volume per year, period 1 (m3sk/ha,yr) | Thinning area per year, all periods (m3sk/ha,yr) | Total production (m3sk/ha,yr) | Comment | Release notes |
| 2.19 | 710d | 21 224 113 | 39 670 | 2 661 | 4 990 | 7.08 | 1 000 | 282 | 16.7 | 7.0 | Version 2.19 | ||
| 2.18.3 | 2153d | 21 192 183 | 39 608 | 2 669 | 4 959 | 7.11 | 1 002 | 293 | 16.9 | 7.0 | Version 2.18.3 | ||
| 2.18.2 | 2067d | 21 192 183 | 39 608 | 2 669 | 4 959 | 7.11 | 1 002 | 293 | 16.9 | 7.0 | Version 2.18.2 | ||
| 2.18 | 1425d | 21 298 040 | 39 814 | 2 659 | 4 932 | 7.12 | 1 003 | 293 | 16.9 | 7.0 | Version 2.18 | ||
| 2.17 | 1297d | 20 308 979 | 37 886 | 2 542 | 4 574 | 6.80 | 799 | 266 | 14.7 | 6.5 | |||
| 2.16 | 1336d | 20 307 509 | 37 883 | 2 528 | 4 574 | 6.76 | 799 | 266 | 14.7 | 6.5 | Version 2.16 | ||
| 2.16 RC | 1228a | 20 114 643 | 37 515 | 2 612 | 2 607 | 6.92 | 765 | 302 | 13.7 | 6.31 | Version 2.16 | ||
| 2.15.4 | 2961 (49m 21s)a |
1247a | 20 114 643 | 37 515 | 2 612 | 2 607 | 6.92 | 765 | 302 | 13.7 | 6.31 | Version 2.15 | |
| 2.14 | 2861 (48m 41s)a |
1132a | 20 060 196 | 37 412 | 2 685 | 2 633 | 7.33 | 748 | 340 | 13.7 | 6.25 | Version 2.14 | |
| 2.13 | 2894 (48m 14s)a |
1038a | 19 997 049 | 37 365 | 2 685 | 2 633 | 7.33 | 748 | 340 | 13.7 | 6.25 | Version 2.13 | |
| 2.12.3 | 1010a | 20 081 186 | 37 527 | 2 681 | 2 622 | 7.35 | 748 | 331 | 13.6 | 6.23 | Increased npv: New bucking algorithm, bug fixed | Version 2.12 | |
| 2.12.3c | 983a | 19 915 687 | 37 207 | 2 713 | 2 637 | 7.36 | 718 | 376 | 13.3 | 6.25 | Understorey cleaning inactivated | Version 2.12 | |
| 2.11.1b | 2483s (41m 23s)a |
19 707 063 | 36 824 | 2 680 | 2 610 | 7.34 | 756 | 326 | 13.8 | 6.24 | Version 2.11 | ||
| 2.10 | 2532s (42m 12s)a |
- | 19 606 195 | 36 624 | 2 711 | 2 652 | 7.40 | 697 | 403 | 11.5 | 6.20 | Version 2.10 | |
| 2.8.0 | 2360s (39m 20s)a |
- | 19 652 164 | 36 712 | 2 724 | 2 652 | 7.40 | 713 | 389 | 11.7 | 6.29 | Version 2.8.0 | |
| 2.6.0 | 2370s (40m 30s)a |
- | 19 634 926 | 36 679 | 2 724 | 2 652 | 7.40 | 713 | 389 | 11.7 | 6.29 | Version 2.6.0 |
aWindows 7, Processor Intel I7-4770, 4-core, 32GB RAM. Samsung SSD 840 EVO. SQL Server 2012 Prof.
bWith Thinning Period Delay Max = 2 and 0 in generation 1 and 2, respectively.
cWith understorey cleaning inactivated.
dWindows 10, AMD Ryzen 7 4750U, 8-core, 16GB RAM.